Quadro NVS 510M vs GRID K120Q

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GRID K120Q
2014
512 MB DDR3
0.76
+16.9%

GRID K120Q outperforms Quadro NVS 510M by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11121144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.01
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK107G71
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date2 July 2014 (9 years ago)21 August 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125 no data
Current priceno data$105

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed850 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6010.80
Floating-point performance326.4 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GRID K120Q and Quadro NVS 510M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1782 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s19.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GRID K120Q 0.76
+16.9%
NVS 510M 0.65

GRID K120Q outperforms Quadro NVS 510M by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GRID K120Q 293
+15.8%
NVS 510M 253

GRID K120Q outperforms Quadro NVS 510M by 16% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.76 0.65
Recency 2 July 2014 21 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

The GRID K120Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 510M in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K120Q is a workstation card while Quadro NVS 510M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K120Q
GRID K120Q
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Quadro NVS 510M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GRID K120Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.