Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs FireStream 9270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FireStream 9270 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FireStream 9270
2008
2 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
3.48

Iris Xe Graphics MAX outperforms FireStream 9270 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking725623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV770DG1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 November 2008 (15 years ago)31 October 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800768
Core clock speed750 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors956 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0079.20
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs4048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FireStream 9270 3.48
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 5.11
+46.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FireStream 9270 1341
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 1971
+47%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.48 5.11
Recency 13 November 2008 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has a 46.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 540% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 199 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.