GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB vs FirePro W9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FirePro W9000
2012
6 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
15.88
+4.2%

FirePro W9000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by a minimal 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking316328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.225.51
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTahitiN17P-G1 Max-Q
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 June 2012 (11 years ago)30 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data
Current price$877 (0.2x MSRP)$1010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB has 71% better value for money than FirePro W9000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed975 MHz1063 - 1265 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1341 - 1480 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt60 - 70 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8118.4
Floating-point performance3,994 gflops3,789 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro W9000 and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6.144 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5500 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+
StereoOutput3D1no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDAno data6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
−1.3%
81
+1.3%
1440p18−21
−11.1%
20
+11.1%
4K30−35
−6.7%
32
+6.7%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.88 15.24
Recency 14 June 2012 30 May 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 60 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro W9000 and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB.

Be aware that FirePro W9000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate FirePro W9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 183 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.