Quadro K5100M vs FirePro W8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W8000 with Quadro K5100M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W8000
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
10.60
+32.7%

FirePro W8000 outperforms K5100M by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking402488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.031.65
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTahitiN15E-Q5-A2
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date14 June 2012 (12 years ago)23 July 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data
Current price$215 (0.1x MSRP)$440

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W8000 has 265% better value for money than K5100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921536
Core clock speed900 MHz771 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate100.898.69
Floating-point performance3,226 gflops2,369 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro W8000 and Quadro K5100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5500 MHz3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs
Display Portno data1.2
StereoOutput3D1no data
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12
Shader Model5.15
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W8000 10.60
+32.7%
K5100M 7.99

FirePro W8000 outperforms Quadro K5100M by 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W8000 4095
+32.7%
K5100M 3086

FirePro W8000 outperforms Quadro K5100M by 33% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+27.5%
51
−27.5%
4K35−40
+29.6%
27
−29.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Hitman 3 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Hitman 3 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+20%
25
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+20%
10
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

This is how FirePro W8000 and K5100M compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W8000 is 27% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro W8000 is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.60 7.99
Recency 14 June 2012 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 100 Watt

The FirePro W8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W8000 is a workstation card while Quadro K5100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W8000
FirePro W8000
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Quadro K5100M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro W8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 47 votes

Rate Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.