Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs FirePro W7170M

Place in the ranking	514	428
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.67	11.49
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Amethyst	Polaris 21
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 October 2015 (9 years ago)	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1024
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1275 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1202 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	81.60
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	128	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1450 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	92.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
FreeSync	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W7170M 8.22

RX 560X Mobile 10.83
+31.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

W7170M 9708
+18.2%

RX 560X Mobile 8212

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

W7170M 26345
+32.9%

RX 560X Mobile 19829

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

W7170M 6935
+9.6%

RX 560X Mobile 6329

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

W7170M 43124
+21.4%

RX 560X Mobile 35511

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

54
+58.8%

−58.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −20%	18 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −35.3%	23 +35.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −34.6%	35 +34.6%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −5.9%	18 +5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −54.5%	51 +54.5%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −75%	35 +75%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −77.3%	39 +77.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −104%	47 +104%
Valorant	30−33 −66.7%	50 +66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −69.2%	44 +69.2%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +13.3%	15 −13.3%
Dota 2	27−30 −62.1%	47 +62.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +25%	28 −25%
Fortnite	45−50 −4.2%	50 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −27.3%	42 +27.3%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −40%	27−30 +40%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −24.1%	36 +24.1%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −18.2%	26 +18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −55.4%	101 +55.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −21.7%	27−30 +21.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −32%	30−35 +32%
Valorant	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
World of Tanks	120−130 +0.8%	122 −0.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −19.2%	31 +19.2%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +143%	7 −143%
Dota 2	27−30 −128%	66 +128%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −25.7%	40−45 +25.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −12.1%	37 +12.1%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −5%	21 +5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 +124%	29 −124%
Valorant	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −24.4%	50−55 +24.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
World of Tanks	55−60 −30.5%	75−80 +30.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −47.1%	24−27 +47.1%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Valorant	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −33.3%	30−35 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Fortnite	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Valorant	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%

This is how W7170M and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

W7170M is 59% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the W7170M is 143% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

W7170M is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
RX 560X Mobile is ahead in 57 tests (89%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.22	10.83
Recency	2 October 2015	11 April 2018
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	65 Watt

RX 560X Mobile has a 31.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7170M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7170M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.