P102-100 vs FirePro W5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W5000 and P102-100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro W5000
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.05

P102-100 outperforms W5000 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking572539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.611.19
Power efficiency7.172.44
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePitcairnGP102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)12 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

P102-100 has 95% better value for money than FirePro W5000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683200
Core clock speed825 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate39.60336.6
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length183 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W5000 7.05
P102-100 8.01
+13.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W5000 2955
P102-100 3356
+13.6%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

FirePro W5000 9999
P102-100 66104
+561%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

FirePro W5000 12432
P102-100 65600
+428%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.05 8.01
Recency 7 August 2012 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

FirePro W5000 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has a 13.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5000
FirePro W5000
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 129 votes

Rate FirePro W5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5000 or P102-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.