Radeon HD 6755G2 vs GeForce GT 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
620M 710A 720A 720M 800M 810M 820A 820M GT 625M GT 710M GT 720A GT 820M
VS
Radeon HD 6720G2 Radeon HD 6730M Radeon HD 6740G2 Radeon HD 6750M Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6755G2 Radeon HD 6760G2 Radeon HD 6770M Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6775G2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 820M and Radeon HD 6755G2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 820M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.40

HD 6755G2 outperforms GT 820M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 820M GT 820M
HD 6755G2 HD 6755G2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1008997
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.55no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF117no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 November 2013 (11 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96880
Core clock speed775 MHzno data
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18−20
−11.1%
20
+11.1%
Full HD12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GT 820M and HD 6755G2 compete in popular games:

  • HD 6755G2 is 11% faster in 900p
  • HD 6755G2 is 17% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.40 1.43
Recency 27 November 2013 14 June 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GT 820M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6755G2, on the other hand, has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 820M and Radeon HD 6755G2.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GeForce GT 820M
AMD Radeon HD 6755G2
Radeon HD 6755G2
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 820M GeForce GT 820M
vs
GT 635M GeForce GT 635M
HD 6755G2 Radeon HD 6755G2
vs
GT 550M GeForce GT 550M
GT 820M GeForce GT 820M
vs
R5 M335 Radeon R5 M335
RTX 5060 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 5060 Mobile
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
HD Graphics 2500 Graphics 2500
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
UHD Graphics 64EU Graphics 64EU
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Qualcomm X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
RX 550 550
R5 M335 AMD R5 M335
vs
GeForce 820A 820A
R7 M365X AMD R7 M365X
vs
8800M GTX SLI 8800M GTX SLI
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
vs
P102-100 100
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Pro WX 8100 WX 8100
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Pro V320 V320
FirePro M6000 FirePro M6000
vs
RTX A500 Embedded Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 127 votes

Rate GeForce GT 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6755G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 820M or Radeon HD 6755G2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.