FirePro W4190M vs Radeon RX 6600 XT

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 4205$
Games supported 60%
AMD FirePro W4190M
FirePro W4190M
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 825
  • Max video memory 2048 MB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 4000
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 4.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 1968
  • Max video memory 8192 MB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 16000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 696$
Games supported 100%
Graphics card Graphics card AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating62048
Value for money0.1536.63
ArchitectureGCNNavi / RDNA2
GPU code nameMars XTX?Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2015 (6 years ago)30 July 2021 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Price now$4205 $696
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed825 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors950 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60331.4
Floating-point performance691.2 gflopsno data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W4190M 4.16
RX 6600 XT 58.83
+1314%
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • Passmark

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

W4190M 12317
RX 6600 XT 156297
+1169%
W4190M 1663
RX 6600 XT 25652
+1443%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

W4190M 1745
RX 6600 XT 28342
+1524%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

W4190M 2351
RX 6600 XT 39051
+1561%

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W4190M 1108
RX 6600 XT 15685
+1316%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1080p11
−1118%
134
+1118%
1440pno data79
4Kno data44

1920x1080
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−1660%
176
+1660%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−1550%
99
+1550%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 4.16 58.83
Novelty 12 November 2015 30 July 2021
Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 2048
Memory bandwidth 64 256
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that FirePro W4190M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of FirePro W4190M by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to FirePro W4190M from NVIDIA is Quadro M500M, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 2 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA Quadro M500M Quadro M500M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to FirePro W4190M:

Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 XT by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon RX 6600 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce RTX 2070, which is faster by 3% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600 XT:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 ratings
AMD FirePro W4190M
AMD FirePro W4190M
433 ratings
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.