Radeon RX 5600M vs FirePro V3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V3900 with Radeon RX 5600M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V3900
2012
1 GB GDDR3, 199 Watt
1.66

RX 5600M outperforms FirePro V3900 by a whopping 1258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking900229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2135.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTurksNavi 10
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$110 $525

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600M has 16629% better value for money than FirePro V3900.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802304
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1265 MHz
Number of transistors716 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60182.2
Floating-point performance624.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro V3900 and Radeon RX 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data
HD сomponent video output1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V3900 1.66
RX 5600M 22.54
+1258%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms FirePro V3900 by 1258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V3900 641
RX 5600M 8705
+1258%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms FirePro V3900 by 1258% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−1333%
86
+1333%
1440p4−5
−1275%
55
+1275%
4K2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−1150%
450−500
+1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 67
−1243%
900−950
+1243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
−1257%
950−1000
+1257%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−1251%
1000−1050
+1251%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 76
−1216%
1000−1050
+1216%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−1150%
450−500
+1150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−1246%
700−750
+1246%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−1233%
800−850
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−1250%
1350−1400
+1250%
Hitman 3 67
−1243%
900−950
+1243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
−1233%
2000−2050
+1233%
Metro Exodus 137
−1250%
1850−1900
+1250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 76
−1216%
1000−1050
+1216%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−1216%
1000−1050
+1216%
Watch Dogs: Legion 78
−1246%
1050−1100
+1246%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60
−1233%
800−850
+1233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
−1193%
750−800
+1193%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−1251%
1000−1050
+1251%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
−1224%
900−950
+1224%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−1150%
450−500
+1150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−1246%
700−750
+1246%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−1233%
800−850
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−1250%
1350−1400
+1250%
Hitman 3 55
−1173%
700−750
+1173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−1248%
1200−1250
+1248%
Metro Exodus 89
−1248%
1200−1250
+1248%
Red Dead Redemption 2 68
−1224%
900−950
+1224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−1216%
1000−1050
+1216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 104
−1246%
1400−1450
+1246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 217
−1236%
2900−2950
+1236%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
−1227%
650−700
+1227%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45
−1233%
600−650
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
−1200%
650−700
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−1150%
450−500
+1150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−1246%
700−750
+1246%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−1250%
1350−1400
+1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 101
−1237%
1350−1400
+1237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−1216%
1000−1050
+1216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−1228%
850−900
+1228%
Watch Dogs: Legion 32
−1150%
400−450
+1150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 67
−1243%
900−950
+1243%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−1179%
550−600
+1179%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−1177%
600−650
+1177%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−1216%
500−550
+1216%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−1150%
550−600
+1150%
Hitman 3 38
−1216%
500−550
+1216%
Horizon Zero Dawn 73
−1201%
950−1000
+1201%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−1210%
550−600
+1210%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−1254%
650−700
+1254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
−1246%
350−400
+1246%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−1251%
500−550
+1251%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1218%
290−300
+1218%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Hitman 3 20
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1246%
350−400
+1246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−1190%
400−450
+1190%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
−1182%
500−550
+1182%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−1218%
290−300
+1218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
−1208%
170−180
+1208%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−1250%
270−280
+1250%

This is how FirePro V3900 and RX 5600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600M is 1333% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600M is 1275% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600M is 1600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 22.54
Recency 7 February 2012 7 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 60 Watt

The Radeon RX 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 5600M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 92 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 229 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.