NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs AMD FirePro M6100

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

FirePro M6100
5.48

GeForce GT 750M SLI outperforms FirePro M6100 by 26% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking568521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.531.25
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameBonaireN14P-GT
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years old)1 April 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$120 $545
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro M6100 has 102% better value for money than GT 750M SLI.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed1100 MHz967 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1300 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate51.60no data
Floating-point performance1,651 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on FirePro M6100 and GeForce GT 750M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M6100 5.48
GT 750M SLI 6.88
+25.5%

GeForce GT 750M SLI outperforms FirePro M6100 by 26% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FirePro M6100 19876
+23.1%
GT 750M SLI 16142

FirePro M6100 outperforms GeForce GT 750M SLI by 23% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FirePro M6100 5369
+15.9%
GT 750M SLI 4634

FirePro M6100 outperforms GeForce GT 750M SLI by 16% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FirePro M6100 3837
+3.6%
GT 750M SLI 3703

FirePro M6100 outperforms GeForce GT 750M SLI by 4% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FirePro M6100 25342
+7.9%
GT 750M SLI 23491

FirePro M6100 outperforms GeForce GT 750M SLI by 8% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

FirePro M6100 56
+26.9%
GT 750M SLI 44

FirePro M6100 outperforms GeForce GT 750M SLI by 27% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
−9.6%
57
+9.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Hitman 3 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3
Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how FirePro M6100 and GT 750M SLI compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GT 750M SLI is 9.6% faster than FirePro M6100

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 750M SLI is 250% faster than the FirePro M6100.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI is ahead in 62 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.48 6.88
Recency 1 October 2013 1 April 2013

The GeForce GT 750M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 750M SLI is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 139 votes

Rate AMD FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 14 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.