Radeon RX 6800 XT vs FirePro D500

Place in performance ranking	395	24
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.78	28.09
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Tahiti	Navi 21
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 January 2014 (10 years ago)	18 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649
Current price	$475	$696 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6800 XT has 910% better value for money than FirePro D500.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	4608
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	69.60	648.0
Floating-point performance	2,227 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	279 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	243.8 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −587%	206 +587%
1440p	21−24 −557%	138 +557%
4K	14−16 −550%	91 +550%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.73	64.81
Recency	18 January 2014	18 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	300 Watt