Radeon RX 6900 XT vs FirePro W7100

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

FirePro W7100
14.95

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms FirePro W7100 by 363% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking32618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.1818.51
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2017)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTongaNavi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 August 2014 (9 years old)8 December 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$466 $957 (1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 257% better value for money than FirePro W7100.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17925120
Core clock speed920 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate103.0720.0
Floating-point performance3,297 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+
StereoOutput3D1no data
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data
HD сomponent video output1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W7100 14.95
RX 6900 XT 69.29
+363%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms FirePro W7100 by 363% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W7100 5794
RX 6900 XT 26859
+364%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms FirePro W7100 by 364% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−383%
193
+383%
1440p27−30
−396%
134
+396%
4K16−18
−419%
83
+419%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 14.95 69.29
Recency 12 August 2014 8 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 300 Watt

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7100 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W7100
FirePro W7100
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 63 votes

Rate AMD FirePro W7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3332 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.