Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs ATI FireGL X3-256

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.21
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameR420DG1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2004 (20 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed491 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.89279.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1224
TMUs1248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed454 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth29.06 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2004 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 128% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X3-256 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X3-256 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 205 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.