Hainan vs Cypress
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Cypress and Hainan, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Cypress outperforms Hainan by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 507 | 726 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Sea Islands |
GPU code name | Cypress | Hainan |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1600 | 320 |
Number of transistors | 2,154 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
ROPs | 32 | Unknown |
TMUs | 80 | Unknown |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 (5.1) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 (1.2) |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.170 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 8.18 | 3.47 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Cypress has a 135.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Hainan, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Cypress is our recommended choice as it beats the Hainan in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.