UHD Graphics 750 vs Arc Graphics 140V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140V
16 GB LPDDR5x
13.43
+198%

Arc Graphics 140V outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.74
ArchitectureXe² (2025)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPURocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8256
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 140V 13.43
+198%
UHD Graphics 750 4.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5163
+198%
UHD Graphics 750 1733

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+233%
12−14
−233%
1440p20
+233%
6−7
−233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+350%
10−11
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+238%
12−14
−238%
Counter-Strike 2 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+311%
18−20
−311%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Valorant 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+238%
12−14
−238%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
Dota 2 44
+214%
14−16
−214%
Far Cry 5 35
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Fortnite 75−80
+192%
24−27
−192%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+242%
18−20
−242%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+207%
14−16
−207%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+154%
35−40
−154%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+173%
14−16
−173%
Valorant 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%
World of Tanks 180−190
+140%
75−80
−140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+238%
12−14
−238%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+122%
21−24
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+200%
18−20
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+154%
35−40
−154%
Valorant 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
World of Tanks 95−100
+197%
30−35
−197%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 14
−121%
30−35
+121%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Valorant 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Dota 2 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Fortnite 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Valorant 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 233% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 233% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 1350% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 121% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 51 test (96%)
  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.43 4.51
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 197.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 401 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.