Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6 GB
2024
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
27.75
+109%

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking201386
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation76.18no data
Power efficiency27.15no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameGA107Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23048
Core clock speed1042 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1470 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate105.8no data
Floating-point processing power6.774 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs72no data
Tensor Cores72no data
Ray Tracing Cores18no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width96 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 6 GB 27.75
+109%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 6 GB 10690
+109%
Arc Graphics 140V 5115

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+100%
40
−100%
1440p40−45
+100%
20
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.24no data
1440p4.48no data

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.75 13.28
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm

RTX 3050 6 GB has a 109% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1180 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.