Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Arc Graphics 140V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
11.59
+31.4%

Arc Graphics 140V outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking393451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nm5 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xno data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212_2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140V 11.59
+31.4%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 8.82

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 140V 10688
+57.7%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 6776

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 140V 9492
+79.3%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 5295

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 140V 53014
+78.1%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 29765

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc Graphics 140V 4038
+109%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 1930

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+60%
25
−60%
1440p20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 63
+40%
45−50
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 87
+569%
13
−569%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31%
40−45
−31%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+673%
11
−673%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 51
+59.4%
30−35
−59.4%
Fortnite 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+8%
50
−8%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+35.3%
30−35
−35.3%
Valorant 100−110
+18.5%
90−95
−18.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30
+87.5%
16
−87.5%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31%
40−45
−31%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+223%
13
−223%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+36.2%
130−140
−36.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Far Cry 5 45
+87.5%
24
−87.5%
Fortnite 70−75
+28.1%
55−60
−28.1%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+38.5%
39
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+193%
15
−193%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+35.3%
30−35
−35.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+148%
24−27
−148%
Valorant 100−110
+18.5%
90−95
−18.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+31%
40−45
−31%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Far Cry 5 42
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+80%
30
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+35.3%
30−35
−35.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Valorant 100−110
+18.5%
90−95
−18.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+30.1%
70−75
−30.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+121%
45−50
−121%
Valorant 130−140
+34%
100−105
−34%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.8%
21−24
−47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 35
+75%
20−22
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 60% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 43% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 673% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 44 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.59 8.82
Recency 24 September 2024 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 3 nm 5 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 31.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.