Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs Arc Graphics 140T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 140T and M1 8-Core GPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 140T outperforms M1 8-Core GPU by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 410 | 428 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe+ (2025) | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1278 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 5 nm |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 46
+64.3%
| 28
−64.3%
|
| 1440p | 16
+14.3%
| 14−16
−14.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80
+5.6%
|
70−75
−5.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+8.7%
|
21−24
−8.7%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+7.1%
|
55−60
−7.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80
+5.6%
|
70−75
−5.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 48
+14.3%
|
40−45
−14.3%
|
| Fortnite | 75−80
+4%
|
75−80
−4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45
−7.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+8.7%
|
21−24
−8.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+6.4%
|
45−50
−6.4%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+3.6%
|
110−120
−3.6%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+7.1%
|
55−60
−7.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 75−80
+5.6%
|
70−75
−5.6%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190
+4.4%
|
180−190
−4.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45
+7.1%
|
40−45
−7.1%
|
| Fortnite | 75−80
+4%
|
75−80
−4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45
−7.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 29
−69%
|
45−50
+69%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+8.7%
|
21−24
−8.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+6.4%
|
45−50
−6.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 57
+67.6%
|
30−35
−67.6%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+3.6%
|
110−120
−3.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+7.1%
|
55−60
−7.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
−5%
|
40−45
+5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+8.7%
|
21−24
−8.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+6.4%
|
45−50
−6.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 31
−9.7%
|
30−35
+9.7%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80
+4%
|
75−80
−4%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+4%
|
24−27
−4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+5.2%
|
95−100
−5.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12
−66.7%
|
20−22
+66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+4.4%
|
130−140
−4.4%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+8.6%
|
35−40
−8.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+7.1%
|
27−30
−7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+6.5%
|
30−35
−6.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−33
+7.1%
|
27−30
−7.1%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+4%
|
24−27
−4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Valorant | 75−80
+7.1%
|
70−75
−7.1%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
1440p
High
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
This is how Arc Graphics 140T and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 140T is 64% faster in 1080p
- Arc Graphics 140T is 14% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140T is 68% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 69% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 140T performs better in 55 tests (83%)
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU performs better in 4 tests (6%)
- there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.75 | 12.04 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 10 November 2020 |
Arc Graphics 140T has a 5.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc Graphics 140T and M1 8-Core GPU.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
