Radeon 840M vs Arc Graphics 130V
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon 840M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc Graphics 130V outperforms 840M by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 439 | 451 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe² (2024) | RDNA 3+ (2024) |
| GPU code name | Lunar Lake iGPU | Krackan Point |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) | 2 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 256 |
| Boost clock speed | 1850 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm | 4 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | no data |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 7500 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 33
+10%
| 30−35
−10%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 51
−11.8%
|
55−60
+11.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+6.5%
|
45−50
−6.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 47
−21.3%
|
55−60
+21.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 43
+22.9%
|
35−40
−22.9%
|
| Fortnite | 65−70
+4.8%
|
60−65
−4.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+4.3%
|
45−50
−4.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40
+6.1%
|
30−35
−6.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+5.3%
|
35−40
−5.3%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+4.1%
|
95−100
−4.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+6.5%
|
45−50
−6.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 25
−128%
|
55−60
+128%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
+4.5%
|
150−160
−4.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
+11.4%
|
35−40
−11.4%
|
| Fortnite | 65−70
+4.8%
|
60−65
−4.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+4.3%
|
45−50
−4.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40
+6.1%
|
30−35
−6.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 41
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+9.5%
|
21−24
−9.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+5.3%
|
35−40
−5.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+4.1%
|
95−100
−4.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+6.5%
|
45−50
−6.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+4.3%
|
45−50
−4.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+5.3%
|
35−40
−5.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+7.4%
|
95−100
−7.4%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 65−70
+4.8%
|
60−65
−4.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+10.5%
|
18−20
−10.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 85−90
+6.3%
|
80−85
−6.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 75−80
+7.1%
|
70−75
−7.1%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+5.1%
|
110−120
−5.1%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+8%
|
24−27
−8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+7.1%
|
55−60
−7.1%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14
−15.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
This is how Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon 840M compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130V is 10% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 23% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 840M is 128% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130V is ahead in 54 tests (90%)
- Radeon 840M is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.24 | 10.60 |
| Recency | 24 September 2024 | 2 June 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
Arc Graphics 130V has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon 840M.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
