Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon 890M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 890M and Arc Graphics 130V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 890M
2024
15 Watt
18.99
+89%

890M outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency100.00no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameStrix PointLunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate185.6no data
Floating-point processing power5.939 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 890M 18.99
+89%
Arc Graphics 130V 10.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 890M 8485
+88.9%
Arc Graphics 130V 4492

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 890M 16023
+68.3%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 890M 9573
+16%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 890M 3533
+9%
Arc Graphics 130V 3242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+41.9%
31
−41.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 59
+119%
27−30
−119%
Counter-Strike 2 117
+129%
51
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 46
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+75%
45−50
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+93.6%
47
−93.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry 5 58
+41.5%
41
−41.5%
Fortnite 100−110
+65.6%
60−65
−65.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+76.6%
45−50
−76.6%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+94.1%
30−35
−94.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+103%
35−40
−103%
Valorant 150−160
+50%
100−105
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+75%
45−50
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 44
+76%
25
−76%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+49.4%
160−170
−49.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry 5 53
+43.2%
37
−43.2%
Fortnite 100−110
+65.6%
60−65
−65.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+76.6%
45−50
−76.6%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+94.1%
30−35
−94.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+34.1%
41
−34.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+103%
35−40
−103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
Valorant 150−160
+50%
100−105
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+75%
45−50
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry 5 50
+51.5%
33
−51.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+76.6%
45−50
−76.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+103%
35−40
−103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Valorant 150−160
+50%
100−105
−50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+65.6%
60−65
−65.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+120%
20−22
−120%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+77.1%
80−85
−77.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+161%
65−70
−161%
Valorant 180−190
+58%
110−120
−58%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+104%
21−24
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+109%
21−24
−109%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+72.7%
21−24
−72.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%
Valorant 110−120
+103%
55−60
−103%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+89.5%
18−20
−89.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%

This is how Radeon 890M and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 890M is 42% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 890M is 280% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 890M is ahead in 59 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.99 10.05
Recency 15 July 2024 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm

Radeon 890M has a 89% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 890M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 145 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 890M or Arc Graphics 130V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.