Radeon RX 7800M vs Arc B580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc B580 with Radeon RX 7800M, including specs and performance data.

Arc B580
2025
12 GB GDDR6, 190 Watt
39.89
+18.4%

Arc B580 outperforms RX 7800M by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking106158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation94.09no data
Power efficiency14.6413.06
ArchitectureXe2 (2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBMG-G21Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 January 2025 (recently)11 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603840
Core clock speed2670 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2670 MHz2335 MHz
Number of transistors19,600 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate427.2560.4
Floating-point processing power13.67 TFLOPS35.87 TFLOPS
ROPs8096
TMUs160240
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores2060

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length272 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2375 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth456.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc B580 39.89
+18.4%
RX 7800M 33.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc B580 15528
+18.4%
RX 7800M 13117

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD125
+25%
100−110
−25%
1440p70
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
4K42
+20%
35−40
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.99no data
1440p3.56no data
4K5.93no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 143
+19.2%
120−130
−19.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+24.7%
85−90
−24.7%
Counter-Strike 2 117
+23.2%
95−100
−23.2%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+20%
80−85
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Valorant 160−170
+24.6%
130−140
−24.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+24.7%
85−90
−24.7%
Counter-Strike 2 104
+22.4%
85−90
−22.4%
Dota 2 140
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 69
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Fortnite 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
Metro Exodus 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+19.4%
170−180
−19.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+20.8%
120−130
−20.8%
Valorant 160−170
+24.6%
130−140
−24.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+21.3%
230−240
−21.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+24.7%
85−90
−24.7%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+23.8%
80−85
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+19.4%
170−180
−19.4%
Valorant 160−170
+24.6%
130−140
−24.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 69
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
World of Tanks 250−260
+22.4%
210−220
−22.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+19.1%
110−120
−19.1%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+24.3%
70−75
−24.3%
Valorant 120−130
+29%
100−105
−29%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Dota 2 78
+20%
65−70
−20%
Metro Exodus 46
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+20%
110−120
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Fortnite 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Valorant 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%

This is how Arc B580 and RX 7800M compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 25% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 27% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.89 33.70
Recency 16 January 2025 11 September 2024
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 180 Watt

Arc B580 has a 18.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

RX 7800M, on the other hand, has 5.6% lower power consumption.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7800M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc B580 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc B580
Arc B580
AMD Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 415 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.