RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Arc A550M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A550M with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

Arc A550M
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.45

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms A550M by a whopping 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking27220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.8078.13
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-512GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2022 (3 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488960
Core clock speed900 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate262.4374.4
Floating-point processing power8.397 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs128280
Tensor Cores256280
Ray Tracing Cores1670
L1 Cache3 MB8.8 MB
L2 Cache8 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−205%
400−450
+205%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−198%
140−150
+198%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
−215%
290−300
+215%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−205%
400−450
+205%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−207%
230−240
+207%
Fortnite 110−120
−204%
350−400
+204%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−215%
290−300
+215%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−215%
230−240
+215%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−198%
140−150
+198%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−211%
280−290
+211%
Valorant 160−170
−209%
500−550
+209%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
−215%
290−300
+215%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−205%
400−450
+205%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−216%
800−850
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%
Dota 2 120−130
−192%
350−400
+192%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−207%
230−240
+207%
Fortnite 110−120
−204%
350−400
+204%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−215%
290−300
+215%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−215%
230−240
+215%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−210%
260−270
+210%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−198%
140−150
+198%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−214%
160−170
+214%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−211%
280−290
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−209%
210−220
+209%
Valorant 160−170
−209%
500−550
+209%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
−215%
290−300
+215%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−200%
150−160
+200%
Dota 2 120−130
−192%
350−400
+192%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−207%
230−240
+207%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−215%
290−300
+215%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−198%
140−150
+198%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−211%
280−290
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−209%
210−220
+209%
Valorant 160−170
−209%
500−550
+209%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
−204%
350−400
+204%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−206%
150−160
+206%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−203%
500−550
+203%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−210%
130−140
+210%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−216%
550−600
+216%
Valorant 190−200
−202%
600−650
+202%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−208%
200−210
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−204%
70−75
+204%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−205%
180−190
+205%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−209%
170−180
+209%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
Valorant 130−140
−196%
400−450
+196%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Dota 2 75−80
−212%
240−250
+212%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.45 67.89
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

Arc A550M has 16.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 216.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A550M is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 90 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A550M or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.