Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Arc A530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A530M with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Arc A530M
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 65 Watt
19.06

AI PRO R9700 outperforms Arc A530M by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.3417.99
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-256Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2023 (2 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364096
Core clock speed900 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors11,500 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8747.5
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs96256
Tensor Cores192128
Ray Tracing Cores1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A530M 19.06
AI PRO R9700 70.86
+272%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A530M 7988
AI PRO R9700 29693
+272%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−264%
400−450
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−270%
300−310
+270%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−264%
400−450
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Fortnite 100−110
−243%
350−400
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−267%
290−300
+267%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−261%
220−230
+261%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−265%
270−280
+265%
Valorant 140−150
−245%
500−550
+245%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−270%
300−310
+270%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−264%
400−450
+264%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−265%
850−900
+265%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Fortnite 100−110
−243%
350−400
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−267%
290−300
+267%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−261%
220−230
+261%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−261%
260−270
+261%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−257%
150−160
+257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−265%
270−280
+265%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Valorant 140−150
−245%
500−550
+245%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−270%
300−310
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−267%
290−300
+267%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−265%
270−280
+265%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Valorant 140−150
−245%
500−550
+245%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−243%
350−400
+243%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−255%
500−550
+255%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−251%
600−650
+251%
Valorant 180−190
−259%
650−700
+259%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−264%
160−170
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−254%
170−180
+254%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Valorant 110−120
−260%
400−450
+260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.06 70.86
Recency 1 August 2023 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

Arc A530M has 361.5% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 271.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A530M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 213 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A530M or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.