Radeon R7 265 vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with Radeon R7 265, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
18.14
+74.9%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms R7 265 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking284404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.72
ArchitectureXe LPGGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUPitcairn
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current priceno data$242 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Boost clock speed2300 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data59.20
Floating-point performanceno data1,894 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Radeon R7 265 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinityno data1
HDMIno data+
DisplayPort supportno data-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
CrossFireno data1
Endurono data-
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data-
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data-
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Mantleno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.14
+74.9%
R7 265 10.37

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Radeon R7 265 by 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679
+66.3%
R7 265 5220

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Radeon R7 265 by 66% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
1440p16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+61.3%
30−35
−61.3%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+69.5%
55−60
−69.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+62.2%
35−40
−62.2%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+62.2%
37
−62.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+73.5%
45−50
−73.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+66.7%
80−85
−66.7%
Hitman 3 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+66.7%
33
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+72.4%
55−60
−72.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+69.6%
55−60
−69.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+61.3%
30−35
−61.3%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+69.5%
55−60
−69.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+62.2%
35−40
−62.2%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+71.4%
35
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+73.5%
45−50
−73.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+66.7%
80−85
−66.7%
Hitman 3 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+66.7%
27
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+63.9%
60−65
−63.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+72.4%
55−60
−72.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+74.4%
43
−74.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+69.6%
55−60
−69.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+61.3%
30−35
−61.3%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+69.5%
55−60
−69.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+66.7%
33
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+73.5%
45−50
−73.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+66.7%
80−85
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+73.9%
23
−73.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+69.6%
55−60
−69.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+73.9%
21−24
−73.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+62.2%
35−40
−62.2%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+66.7%
30−35
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Hitman 3 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and R7 265 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 90% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 78% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.14 10.37
Recency 14 December 2023 13 February 2014
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 265 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon R7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 368 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.