Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
18.14
+579%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Radeon R5 430 OEM by a whopping 579% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking284774
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPGGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUOland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)30 June 2016 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speedno data730 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz780 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.72
Floating-point performanceno data599.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Radeon R5 430 OEM compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data36.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+700%
5−6
−700%
1440p16
+700%
2−3
−700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 240−250
+567%
35−40
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 210−220
+577%
30−35
−577%
Battlefield 5 400−450
+578%
55−60
−578%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 250−260
+576%
35−40
−576%
Far Cry 5 250−260
+576%
37
−576%
Far Cry New Dawn 300−310
+512%
45−50
−512%
Forza Horizon 4 550−600
+555%
80−85
−555%
Hitman 3 240−250
+567%
35−40
−567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+567%
33
−567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 300−310
+500%
50−55
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+503%
55−60
−503%
Watch Dogs: Legion 350−400
+525%
55−60
−525%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 240−250
+567%
35−40
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 210−220
+577%
30−35
−577%
Battlefield 5 400−450
+578%
55−60
−578%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 250−260
+576%
35−40
−576%
Far Cry 5 230−240
+557%
35
−557%
Far Cry New Dawn 300−310
+512%
45−50
−512%
Forza Horizon 4 550−600
+555%
80−85
−555%
Hitman 3 240−250
+567%
35−40
−567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+567%
27
−567%
Metro Exodus 400−450
+556%
60−65
−556%
Red Dead Redemption 2 300−310
+500%
50−55
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+503%
55−60
−503%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 290−300
+574%
43
−574%
Watch Dogs: Legion 350−400
+525%
55−60
−525%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 240−250
+567%
35−40
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 210−220
+577%
30−35
−577%
Battlefield 5 400−450
+578%
55−60
−578%
Far Cry 5 220−230
+567%
33
−567%
Far Cry New Dawn 300−310
+512%
45−50
−512%
Forza Horizon 4 550−600
+555%
80−85
−555%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+552%
23
−552%
Watch Dogs: Legion 350−400
+525%
55−60
−525%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+552%
21−24
−552%
Hitman 3 140−150
+567%
21−24
−567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+576%
35−40
−576%
Metro Exodus 220−230
+567%
30−35
−567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 200−210
+567%
30−33
−567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240−250
+567%
35−40
−567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+557%
35−40
−557%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+567%
30−33
−567%
Far Cry New Dawn 230−240
+557%
35−40
−557%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+557%
35−40
−557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+550%
20−22
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
Hitman 3 95−100
+579%
14−16
−579%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+550%
20−22
−550%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+547%
16−18
−547%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+567%
12−14
−567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+567%
9−10
−567%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+567%
18−20
−567%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+579%
14−16
−579%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+540%
24−27
−540%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+543%
7−8
−543%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and R5 430 OEM compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 700% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 700% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.14 2.67
Recency 14 December 2023 30 June 2016
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 430 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon R5 430 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 334 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.