P106-090 vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
18.13
+199%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms P106-090 by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking284553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.56
ArchitectureXe LPGPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGP106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)31 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Current priceno data$26

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8768
Core clock speedno data1354 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.49
Floating-point performanceno data2,352 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc 8-Cores iGPU and P106-090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data8008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDAno data6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+233%
12−14
−233%
1440p16
+220%
5−6
−220%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+178%
35−40
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+190%
30−35
−190%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+188%
55−60
−188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+197%
35−40
−197%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+197%
37
−197%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+186%
45−50
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+198%
80−85
−198%
Hitman 3 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+188%
33
−188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+180%
50−55
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+193%
55−60
−193%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+186%
55−60
−186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+178%
35−40
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+190%
30−35
−190%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+188%
55−60
−188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+197%
35−40
−197%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+186%
35
−186%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+186%
45−50
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+198%
80−85
−198%
Hitman 3 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+196%
27
−196%
Metro Exodus 180−190
+195%
60−65
−195%
Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+180%
50−55
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+193%
55−60
−193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+179%
43
−179%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+186%
55−60
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+178%
35−40
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+190%
30−35
−190%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+188%
55−60
−188%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+188%
33
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+186%
45−50
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+198%
80−85
−198%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+183%
23
−183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+186%
55−60
−186%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+183%
21−24
−183%
Hitman 3 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+197%
35−40
−197%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+188%
30−35
−188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+183%
30−33
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+178%
35−40
−178%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+183%
30−33
−183%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+175%
20−22
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Hitman 3 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+175%
20−22
−175%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+194%
16−18
−194%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+180%
24−27
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and P106-090 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 233% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 220% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.13 6.06
Recency 14 December 2023 31 July 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-090 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while P106-090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 48 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.