GeForce GTX 690 vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with GeForce GTX 690, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
18.13
+25.6%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms GTX 690 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking284335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.00
ArchitectureXe LPGKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)3 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current priceno data$411 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81536
CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speedno data915 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1019 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data234 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data2x 3,130 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc 8-Cores iGPU and GeForce GTX 690 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data11.0" (27.9 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataTwo 8-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
Memory bus widthno data512-bit (256-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speedno data6008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMIno dataYes (via dongle)
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Vision Liveno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.126
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.13
+25.6%
GTX 690 14.43

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms GeForce GTX 690 by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679
GTX 690 13160
+51.6%

GeForce GTX 690 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 52% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%
1440p16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 37
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Far Cry 5 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and GTX 690 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 33% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 33% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.13 14.43
Recency 14 December 2023 3 May 2012
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 690 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 690 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GeForce GTX 690

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 185 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.