RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Arc 7-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 7-Cores iGPU with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Arc 7-Cores iGPU
2023
17.16

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc 7-Cores iGPU by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.03
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUAD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72816
Core clock speedno data1620 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data187.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
−165%
90−95
+165%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−159%
75−80
+159%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−157%
90−95
+157%
Far Cry 5 38
−163%
100−105
+163%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−164%
290−300
+164%
Hitman 3 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−156%
220−230
+156%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−159%
220−230
+159%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−159%
75−80
+159%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−157%
90−95
+157%
Far Cry 5 34
−165%
90−95
+165%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−164%
290−300
+164%
Hitman 3 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−156%
220−230
+156%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−150%
130−140
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−159%
220−230
+159%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−159%
75−80
+159%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−163%
150−160
+163%
Far Cry 5 35
−157%
90−95
+157%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−164%
290−300
+164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−150%
55−60
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−159%
220−230
+159%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Hitman 3 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−157%
90−95
+157%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−166%
85−90
+166%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−159%
75−80
+159%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−165%
90−95
+165%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−165%
90−95
+165%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−166%
250−260
+166%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−167%
280−290
+167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Hitman 3 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−158%
230−240
+158%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

This is how Arc 7-Cores iGPU and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 165% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.16 45.86
Recency 14 December 2023 12 February 2024

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 167.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 7-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 38 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 20 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.