Radeon RX 460 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Apple M1 8-Core GPU with Radeon RX 460, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
14.40
+35.3%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms RX 460 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking362429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.12
Architectureno dataGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataBaffin
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (3 years ago)8 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8896
Core clock speed1278 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data67.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.15 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 14.40
+35.3%
RX 460 10.64

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200
RX 460 307888
+9.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−56%
39
+56%
1440p60−65
+27.7%
47
−27.7%
4K27−30
+28.6%
21
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−6.3%
34
+6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+39.4%
30−35
−39.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+29.6%
70−75
−29.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+24.1%
55−60
−24.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+6.8%
44
−6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−68.8%
54
+68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+109%
22
−109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+25.8%
31
−25.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+29.6%
70−75
−29.6%
Hitman 3 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+24.1%
55−60
−24.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+34.3%
35
−34.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+21.4%
27−30
−21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+88.2%
17
−88.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+124%
41
−124%
Hitman 3 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+100%
36
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+47.8%
23
−47.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+46.9%
45−50
−46.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+16%
25
−16%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+29.9%
65−70
−29.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+46.8%
45−50
−46.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12
−8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and RX 460 compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 is 56% faster in 1080p
  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 28% faster in 1440p
  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 124% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 460 is 69% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • RX 460 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.40 10.64
Recency 10 November 2020 8 August 2016
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 35.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while Radeon RX 460 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 901 vote

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1005 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.