GeForce 8600M GT vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce 8600M GT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.63
+4600%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms 8600M GT by a whopping 4600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3861345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.00
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameno dataG84
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)31 December 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores832
Core clock speed1278 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistorsno data289 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataMXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD280−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 70−75
+7300%
1−2
−7300%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
Valorant 110−120
+327%
24−27
−327%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+1285%
12−14
−1285%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Dota 2 85−90
+750%
10−11
−750%
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 70−75
+7300%
1−2
−7300%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Valorant 110−120
+327%
24−27
−327%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Dota 2 85−90
+750%
10−11
−750%
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Valorant 110−120
+327%
24−27
−327%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+7300%
1−2
−7300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+4700%
2−3
−4700%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+5150%
2−3
−5150%
Valorant 130−140
+6700%
2−3
−6700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Valorant 65−70
+3350%
2−3
−3350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 45−50 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 5150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Apple M1 8-Core GPU surpassed 8600M GT in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.63 0.29
Recency 10 November 2020 31 December 2007
Chip lithography 5 nm 80 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 4600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600M GT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
GeForce 8600M GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 928 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 25 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or GeForce 8600M GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.