FirePro D300 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with FirePro D300, including specs and performance data.
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms D300 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 394 | 465 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 4.56 |
Architecture | no data | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
GPU code name | no data | Pitcairn |
Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 18 January 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 850 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 150 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 68.00 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.176 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 32 |
TMUs | no data | 80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 242 mm |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1270 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 162.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | no data | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 28
+55.6%
| 18−21
−55.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+42%
|
50−55
−42%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+40%
|
40−45
−40%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+42%
|
50−55
−42%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+43.3%
|
30−33
−43.3%
|
Fortnite | 70−75
+48%
|
50−55
−48%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+54.3%
|
35−40
−54.3%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+53.3%
|
30−33
−53.3%
|
Valorant | 110−120
+38.8%
|
80−85
−38.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+40%
|
40−45
−40%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+42%
|
50−55
−42%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190
+38.5%
|
130−140
−38.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Dota 2 | 85−90
+41.7%
|
60−65
−41.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+43.3%
|
30−33
−43.3%
|
Fortnite | 70−75
+48%
|
50−55
−48%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+54.3%
|
35−40
−54.3%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 45−50
+40%
|
35−40
−40%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
Metro Exodus | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18−20
−44.4%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+53.3%
|
30−33
−53.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
Valorant | 110−120
+38.8%
|
80−85
−38.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+40%
|
40−45
−40%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Dota 2 | 85−90
+41.7%
|
60−65
−41.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+43.3%
|
30−33
−43.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+54.3%
|
35−40
−54.3%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+53.3%
|
30−33
−53.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
Valorant | 110−120
+38.8%
|
80−85
−38.8%
|
Fortnite | 70−75
+48%
|
50−55
−48%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+37.1%
|
70−75
−37.1%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+42.9%
|
14−16
−42.9%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+38.8%
|
85−90
−38.8%
|
Valorant | 130−140
+43.2%
|
95−100
−43.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+45.8%
|
24−27
−45.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+47.6%
|
21−24
−47.6%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+40%
|
10−11
−40%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
Fortnite | 27−30
+55.6%
|
18−20
−55.6%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+41.7%
|
12−14
−41.7%
|
Valorant | 65−70
+38%
|
50−55
−38%
|
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Dota 2 | 45−50
+53.3%
|
30−33
−53.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
Fortnite | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and FirePro D300 compete in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 56% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 13.19 | 9.65 |
Recency | 10 November 2020 | 18 January 2014 |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 36.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while FirePro D300 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.