Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU vs FirePro D300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking443not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.70no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)no data
GPU code namePitcairnno data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128032
Core clock speed850 MHz1296 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate68.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2014 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 44 Watt

Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU has an age advantage of 6 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 240.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro D300 and Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation card while Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 451 vote

Rate Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.