Turion X2 RM-75 vs Xeon X5670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1373not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeon (Desktop)2x AMD Turion
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67no data
Current price$44 (0.7x MSRP)$21

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus support6400 MHz4000 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366S1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+no data
PowerNowno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5670 6089
+809%
Turion X2 RM-75 670

Xeon X5670 outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by 809% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon X5670 3698
+115%
Turion X2 RM-75 1717

Xeon X5670 outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by 115% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon X5670 19954
+489%
Turion X2 RM-75 3390

Xeon X5670 outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by 489% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 1 January 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation processor while Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and Turion X2 RM-75, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670
Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 465 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5670 or Turion X2 RM-75, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.