Atom N2650 vs Athlon II X2 220
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X2 220 and Atom N2650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2743 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.30 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.96 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Regor (2009−2013) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 21 September 2010 (14 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $32 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X2 220 and Atom N2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 117 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X2 220 and Atom N2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3,6 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Atom N2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Atom N2650.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 September 2010 | 5 January 2012 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
Atom N2650 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 2066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 220 and Atom N2650. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X2 220 is a desktop processor while Atom N2650 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 220 and Atom N2650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
