Xeon W-3275 vs Platinum 8173M

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	246	161
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.77	7.05
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon Platinum	Intel Xeon W
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date	no data	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,449
Current price	$1999	$5391 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3275 has 816% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8173M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	28 (Octacosa-Core)	28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads	56	56
Base clock speed	no data	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.1 GHz	4.6 GHz
Bus support	no data	4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache	1.75 MB	1.75 MB
L2 cache	28 MB	28 MB
L3 cache	38.5 MB	38.5 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	no data	76 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	8 (Multiprocessor)	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	Socket P	FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
TSX	+	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
Status	no data	Launched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size	1,536 GB	1 TB
Max memory channels	6	6
Maximum memory bandwidth	128.001 GB/s	140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	48	64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W-3275 outperforms Platinum 8173M by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score

20.58

26.87

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---