EPYC 7642 vs Xeon Platinum 8170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated91
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.55
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data15.57
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,405$4,775

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores26 (Hexacosa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads5296
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier2123
L1 cache1.625 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache26 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 April 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 26 48
Threads 52 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8170 has 36.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7642, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 84.6% more physical cores and 84.6% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8170 and EPYC 7642, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8170
Xeon Platinum 8170
AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8170 or EPYC 7642, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.