EPYC 7702 vs Xeon Phi 7210

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1212	36
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.87	2.37
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	no data	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Knights Landing (2016)	Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,450
Current price	$199	$8948 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Phi 7210 has 21% better value for money than EPYC 7702.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	256	128
Base clock speed	1.3 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.35 GHz
L1 cache	32 KB (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	no data	192 mm2
Number of transistors	8,000 million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	3647	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	no data	4 TiB
Max memory channels	no data	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 outperforms Xeon Phi 7210 by 857% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.72	45.17
Recency	20 June 2016	7 August 2019
Threads	256	128
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	200 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7210 and EPYC 7702, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---