EPYC 7702 vs Xeon Phi 7290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated36
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.37
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameKnights Landing (2016)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,450
Current price$488 $8948 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores72 (Doheptaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads288128
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.35 GHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors8,000 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
Socket3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 7 August 2019
Physical cores 72 64
Threads 288 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 200 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7702, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290
AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 41 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 7290 or EPYC 7702, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.