Celeron T3300 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking924not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$29 $14.97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads16no data
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache20 MB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2640 v3 11111
+1692%
Celeron T3300 620

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron T3300 by 1692% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2014 1 January 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron T3300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Intel Celeron T3300
Celeron T3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2622 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 17 votes

Rate Celeron T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Celeron T3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.