Celeron B820 vs V-Series V120
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V120 and Celeron B820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2873 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD V-Series | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | no data | 1.35 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 July 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V120 and Celeron B820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 3200 MHz | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 17 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V120 and Celeron B820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | S1 | FCPGA988,PGA988 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V120 and Celeron B820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
FMA | - | + |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
V-Series V120 and Celeron B820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V120 and Celeron B820 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V120 and Celeron B820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of V-Series V120 and Celeron B820 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V120 and Celeron B820.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 July 2012 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
V-Series V120 has 40% lower power consumption.
Celeron B820, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between V-Series V120 and Celeron B820. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V120 and Celeron B820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.