Celeron B820 vs Turion II P540
Aggregated performance score
Turion II P540 outperforms Celeron B820 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
Comparing Turion II P540 and Celeron B820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2621 | 2717 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Turion II | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 12 May 2010 (13 years ago) | 1 July 2012 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Current price | $28 | $34 (0.4x MSRP) |
Detailed Specifications
Turion II P540 and Celeron B820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Bus support | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II P540 and Celeron B820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1 (S1g4) | FCPGA988,PGA988 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II P540 and Celeron B820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | no data | - |
FMA | no data | + |
VirusProtect | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Turion II P540 and Celeron B820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II P540 and Celeron B820 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II P540 and Celeron B820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.3 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion II P540 and Celeron B820 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | no data | + |
HDMI | no data | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II P540 and Celeron B820.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Turion II P540 outperforms Celeron B820 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Turion II P540 outperforms Celeron B820 by 22% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Turion II P540 outperforms Celeron B820 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 0.65 | 0.53 |
Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 July 2012 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Turion II P540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II P540 and Celeron B820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.