Celeron N6211 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N6211 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2792 | 2166 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.33 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | Elkhart Lake |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Elkhart Lake (2022) |
| Release date | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $54 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 70 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | S1g2 | BGA1493 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.58 | 1.46 |
| Recency | 4 June 2008 | 17 July 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has a 151.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
The Celeron N6211 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
