Xeon E5410 vs Turion II Ultra M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M620
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Xeon E5410 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Ultra M620 and Xeon E5410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27522186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.20
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Turion II Ultrano data
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)no data
Release date10 September 2009 (14 years ago)1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$19.99 $52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M620 and Xeon E5410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Bus support3600 MHzno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cacheno data12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M620 and Xeon E5410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Xeon E5410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Turion II Ultra M620 and Xeon E5410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Xeon E5410 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Ultra M620 0.53
Xeon E5410 1.30
+145%

Xeon E5410 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Turion II Ultra M620 814
Xeon E5410 2007
+147%

Xeon E5410 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by 147% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Turion II Ultra M620 297
Xeon E5410 340
+14.5%

Xeon E5410 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Turion II Ultra M620 550
Xeon E5410 1116
+103%

Xeon E5410 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by 103% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 1.30
Recency 10 September 2009 1 October 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

The Xeon E5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II Ultra M620 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5410 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M620 and Xeon E5410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M620
Turion II Ultra M620
Intel Xeon E5410
Xeon E5410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 27 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 47 votes

Rate Xeon E5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Ultra M620 or Xeon E5410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.