Core 2 Duo E6540 vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
2 cores / 2 threads, 110 Watt
0.57
+11.8%

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6540 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28242884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.490.74
Architecture codenameToledo (2006)no data
Release dateno data1 July 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Bus rate1000 MHz1333 MHz
L3 cacheno data4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataPLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6540 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.51
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Core 2 Duo E6540, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 69.2% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Intel Core 2 Duo E6540
Core 2 Duo E6540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 110 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 or Core 2 Duo E6540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.