Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Turion II Ultra M620
Aggregate performance score
Turion II Ultra M620 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3166 | 3247 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Turion II Ultra | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Merom-2M (2008) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 MB | 512 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.46 | 0.39 |
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 1 May 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 512 Watt |
Turion II Ultra M620 has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 25500% lower power consumption.
The AMD Turion II Ultra M620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
