Athlon II M340 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II M340 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II M340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2980 | 2890 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Athlon II |
| Power efficiency | 1.14 | 1.36 |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II M340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II M340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P | Socket S1 (S1g3) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II M340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II M340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 0.50 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 10 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Athlon II M340 has a 19% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Athlon II M340 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II M340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
