Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Turion II M500
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Turion II M500 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion II M500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2845 | 2800 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Turion II | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.43 | 0.45 |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | August 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion II M500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 220 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II M500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.53 | 0.59 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Turion II M500 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+, on the other hand, has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score.
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II M500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion II M500 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II M500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
