AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+: specs and benchmarks

VS
Price now 53$
Games supported 41%
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Year of release 2007
Performance 0.75

Summary

AMD started AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ sales on August 2007. This is a Windsor architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 90 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3100 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket AM2 processor with a TDP of 125 Watt.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0.75%

of a leader's which is AMD EPYC 9654.

AMD EPYC 9654 EPYC 9654
Compare

General info

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating2481
Value for money1.10
Market segmentDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2009)
Release dateAugust 2007
(15 years old)
Current price$53 of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Boost clock speed3.1 GHzof 6 (Core i9-13900KS)
L1 cache256 KBof 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache512Kof 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache0 KBof 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography90 nmof 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
Die size220 mm2
Number of transistors227 millionof 9900000 (Ryzen 9 7845HX)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8160M)
SocketAM2
Thermal design power (TDP)125 Wattof 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.75
  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 937

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 279

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 505

Is Athlon 64 X2 6000+ good for gaming?

Relative perfomance

Overall Athlon 64 X2 6000+ performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.


Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Intel equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon 64 X2 6000+ from Intel is Celeron E3500, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating.

Intel Celeron E3500 Celeron E3500
Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon 64 X2 6000+:

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Intel Pentium E5400 Pentium E5400
Compare
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Compare
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 Core 2 Duo E7300
Compare
AMD Athlon II X2 215 Athlon II X2 215
Compare
Intel Pentium E5300 Pentium E5300
Compare
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Compare

Best GPUs for Athlon 64 X2 6000+

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Athlon 64 X2 6000+, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 1625 configurations based on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in our database.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
0.4% (6/1625)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
0.06% (1/1625)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
0.2% (3/1625)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XT
0.2% (3/1625)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
0.06% (1/1625)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
0.06% (1/1625)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
0.3% (5/1625)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
0.06% (1/1625)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
0.1% (2/1625)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
0.06% (1/1625)

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


3.6 164 ratings

Rate AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 6000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.