Celeron 1017U vs Turion 64 ML-34

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-3110M Core i3-3217U Core i5-3210M Core i5-3230M Core i7-3610QM Core i7-3630QM Core i7-3632QM

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-34
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18
Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95
+428%

Celeron 1017U outperforms Turion 64 ML-34 by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32632516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.495.29
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date10 March 2005 (19 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Die size125 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-34 0.18
Celeron 1017U 0.95
+428%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 ML-34 694
Celeron 1017U 1719
+148%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.18 0.95
Recency 10 March 2005 1 July 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 1017U has a 427.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 1017U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-34 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 1017U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 ML-34
Turion 64 ML-34
Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
vs
Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-32
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
vs
A9-9420 A9 9420
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
vs
Pentium M 740 Pentium M 740
Celeron SU2300 Celeron SU2300
vs
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Solo T1400 Core Solo T1400
vs
Athlon II Neo K125 Athlon II Neo K125
Athlon II Neo K125 Athlon II Neo K125
vs
Core 2 Solo U2200 Core 2 Solo U2200
Athlon II Neo K125 Athlon II Neo K125
vs
Atom Z530 Atom Z530
Pentium 3805U Pentium 3805U
vs
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
i3-2330E Core i3 2330E
vs
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
vs
i7-8500Y Core i7 8500Y
i7-610E Core i7 610E
vs
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
vs
Pentium Gold 6500Y Pentium Gold 6500Y
Athlon II X4 651 Athlon II X4 651
vs
Pentium 4 630 Pentium 4 630

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 ML-34 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 71 vote

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-34 or Celeron 1017U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.