Turion 64 ML-30 vs Celeron 1017U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-3110M Core i3-3217U Core i5-3210M Core i5-3230M Core i7-3610QM Core i7-3630QM Core i7-3632QM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95
+494%
Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.16

Celeron 1017U outperforms Turion 64 ML-30 by a whopping 494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25163289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronTurion 64
Power efficiency5.260.43
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size94 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023754
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1017U 0.95
+494%
Turion 64 ML-30 0.16

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron 1017U 1719
+179%
Turion 64 ML-30 617

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron 1017U 46.38
+137%
Turion 64 ML-30 110

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.95 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 1017U has a 493.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 1017U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-30 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1017U and Turion 64 ML-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U
AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
vs
A4-6210 A4 6210
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 Pentium 4 M P4-M 1,7
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
vs
A9-9420 A9 9420
Phenom II X2 N640 Phenom II X2 N640
vs
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
Athlon X2 QL-64 Athlon X2 QL-64
vs
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
vs
Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 ML-44
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
vs
Turion 64 MK-38 Turion 64 MK-38
Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-32
vs
Celeron 1017U Celeron 1017U
A6-7000 A6 7000
vs
Celeron 3205U Celeron 3205U
A6-1450 A6 1450
vs
Celeron 3205U Celeron 3205U
Celeron 3205U Celeron 3205U
vs
Athlon II N370 Athlon II N370
Celeron 3205U Celeron 3205U
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
Celeron 3205U Celeron 3205U
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 71 vote

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1017U or Turion 64 ML-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.